*********************** LUXOR <h0444wol@rz.hu-berlin.de> ***********************

###?{WHAT'S NEW}###ian Lütgert <sebastian.luetgert@rz.hu-berlin.de> ************

to acknowlege that one would have to know these projects in the first
'tribal' thinking - which informs the new issue of this magazine:
United States. The fact that Net-/Media-/Computer Art uses these new
unprepared observers. That such a situation also threatens the hegemony
used as themes and as targets for criticism, like the many browser
used the net for purposes, which it was not not designed for, but which
warnings from Cologne, ###!{WINDOWS5.JS}###... Will there be a gangwar?
were admittedly sometimes hard to grasp for "net newbies" -  are
were nevertheless valid and interesting. These early experiments - that
What could be relevant about all the net art projects in the long run
What is exiting about net art is that it operates in a relatively new
where some works can - hopefully - cause irritation and confusion to
which are forced upon it by the hardware and software industry is not
which is filled with numerous false facts - with the following
which is put forward in an article by Isabelle Graw ###!{WINDOWS6.JS}###,
while others depend on false assumptions. When artists feel like it,
why her article doesn't give the internet adresses of any of the art
with a joystick, a mouse or clicking on a webpage is a form of
works - otherwise people might actually look at them and judge for
works, it makes sense that TZK now bashes net art. And that net art

###*(BETA VERSIONS)###**********************************************************
### LUXOR/WindowWorld http://www2.hu-berlin.de/~h0444wol/rolux -> LUXOR ###ux/

[background = http://www2.hu-berlin.de/~h0444wol/rolux/archive/009.txt]

********************************************************************************
  <rolux>  h0444wol@rz.hu-berlin.de  http://www2.hu-berlin.de/~h0444wol/rolux/